![how to make preview default for imessage how to make preview default for imessage](https://mykutonline.theceshop.com/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2021-10/Preview_1.jpeg)
- #How to make preview default for imessage for android#
- #How to make preview default for imessage android#
![how to make preview default for imessage how to make preview default for imessage](https://media.wired.co.uk/photos/606daaf6ef7fc5046319328f/16:9/w_1280,c_limit/ios-10.jpg)
#How to make preview default for imessage android#
How many iPhone users inherently understand that when they text an Android user, those green bubbles can be easily subpoenaed by multiple governments around the world?
#How to make preview default for imessage for android#
I bring up this switching cost problem for a specific reason: adding iMessage to Android would end up being a huge benefit, not just for Android users, but for iPhone users. It’s so convenient and easy that getting iPhone users in the US to use something else just to talk to their Android-using friends is a slog. The way iMessage works is seamless, and (much to switchers’ chagrin) it hijacks the core SMS app. And the default on the iPhone is iMessage. This is especially a problem in America where the iPhone has more market share than in other countries and where people will just default to, well, the default.
![how to make preview default for imessage how to make preview default for imessage](https://bestoftelegram.com/themes/img/iMessage-1.jpg)
Getting them all to agree on one app and stick with it is nearly impossible. But again, there’s a particular problem: getting all of your friends and family to switch over to another app is hard. I don’t want to name them all, but I do want to point out that Signal and Wire, in particular, are good options. I could go down the list on all of them, but just as one example: WhatsApp is the most popular in some regions, but it is owned by Facebook, and, as a result, it’s facing a growing trust problem. There are other apps that enable end-to-end encrypted chats on Android, but each comes with particular compromises. And the largest, most impactful way Apple could do that is to release iMessage on Android.Īpple wants to defend people’s privacy, and iMessage is its strongest tool for doing that Every time I hear Tim Cook talk about privacy as a human right, I think about the biggest thing his company could do to help ensure that privacy: spread the ability for people to have conversations that are safe from government snooping across the world. I am not making a business case for iMessage to come to Android. It also happens to be the most compelling argument against doing it.īut that’s an argument about Apple’s best interests, not humanity’s. The loudest and most common argument is that of course Apple will never do it because a lot of people wouldn’t buy an iPhone because iMessage is the only thing locking them into Apple’s ecosystem. I have heard all of the above points before, and I agree with many of them. It is better to have people standardize on.There are (usually, vaguely stated) technical reasons why iMessage on Android wouldn’t work or wouldn’t be fully secure.Everywhere else in the world, people use alternate texting apps. Really, only people in America care about iMessage.There’s a myriad of options for people on Android who want to have secure, end-to-end encrypted chats.It’s not in Apple’s business interest for it to happen because it would hurt Apple’s iPhone profits.If Apple really wants to establish that identity, it should bring iMessage to Android.īefore you rattle off a tweet, let me be crystal clear about a few things. Here at CES, Apple has trolled the entire electronics industry with a giant banner that reads: “What happens on your iPhone, stays on your iPhone.” It’s clever and designed to spark discussion, but it’s also important because it once again establishes that Apple wants to be known as the company that’s most dedicated to protecting your privacy.